“In January 2009, Michael C. Irving (D.D.C.), a District of Columbia police officer, was sentenced to 14 months in prison, following his conviction in May 2008 of two counts of tax evasion. Irving had fraudulently arranged for the police department to stop withholding taxes on his paychecks, and had filed a 2002 tax return alleging he earned zero wages, despite earning wages of $155,211 that year.

In September 2008, Robert B. Beale (D. Minnesota), the founder and former chief executive officer of Comtrol Corp., was sentenced to over 11 years in prison and ordered to pay a $175,000 fine, following his conviction for conspiracy to defraud the IRS and tax evasion. Beale failed to pay income tax on more than $5 million in income and used a shell corporation to conceal his income.

In August 2008, Hamlet Bennett (D. Hawaii) was sentenced to a term of 78 months in prison and ordered to pay more than $1.3 million in restitution and $35,330 in costs of prosecution, after his conviction for tax evasion for the years 1999 through 2003. Evidence at trial revealed that Bennett purchased “products” from convicted tax offender Royal Lamar Hardy and Hardy’s organization, The Research Foundation, which promoted wide-scale “non-filing” of federal income tax returns.

In May 2008, Louis Genard (W.D. Louisiana), a dentist, was sentenced to 30 months in prison and ordered to pay $155,683 in restitution, following his conviction on three counts of willful failure to file income tax returns. Genard had claimed that he revoked his U.S. citizenship and declared himself a “citizen of the Republic of Louisiana.”

In April 2008, the court sentenced actor Wesley Snipes (M.D. Fla.), to three years in prison; co-defendants Eddie Kahn and Douglas Rosile received 10 years and four and a half years, respectively.” (http://www.usdoj.gov/tax/txdv09336.htm)

See here for more information on IRS enforcement activities.

By Matt Berkus

The IRS filed a substitute for return on my behalf but later I filed the original tax return, can that tax debt be discharged in bankruptcy?

Answer:

If the taxpayer replaced a substitute for return with a taxpayer filed return (an original return), that tax becomes eligible for discharge in bankruptcy assuming all discharge rules are otherwise satisfied.

If a taxpayer goes long enough without having filed a tax return, the IRS will eventually file a tax return on behalf of the taxpayer so the IRS can assess a tax and collect. This IRS filed return is called a Substitute for Return. This outcome is not good because a substitute for return only provides a minimal deduction, so the tax due is usually inflated. In general, it is always advisable for the taxpayer to file a return and replace the substitute for return filed by the IRS.

Certain taxes can be discharged in bankruptcy, see this article. One of the rules is the 2 year rule. The 2 rule states that to discharge income tax in bankruptcy, the required tax return must be filed 2 years or more before the bankruptcy filing date (Bankruptcy Code 523(a)(1)(B)(ii)). It is well settled that a Substitute for Return does NOT count as a filed return for purposes of the 2 year rule. So, to discharge an income tax debt related to a substitute for return, the taxpayer must file an original tax return and wait 2 years to file bankruptcy [assuming all other discharge rules are satisfied].

By: Matt Berkus

Click here for more Move Your Money Movement Link

Bailouts and bonuses have many Americans frustrated with big banks. Some consumers think these giant institutions have lost touch with customers and basic good business practices. They’re so fed up that they’re holding these behemoths accountable by moving their money to community banks.

Click here for Move Your Money Movement Link

Short sales, principal reduction loan modifications and deeds in lieu of foreclosures all present unique tax consequences, and they vary from one person to another. Much of what we are hearing from clients, which they are hearing from others, is either not true or not true for them.

Here are my Top 10 Myths –and the corresponding truths– in this area. With a few exceptions, the myths stem from a grain of truth. But just like the game of telephone, the fact that it began as truth doesn’t mean what you’re hearing is reliable.

Myth #1 – “I won’t owe any income tax because this is homestead property.”
This myth began with the passage of the Mortgage Debt Forgiveness Relief Act (“MDFRA”) in December 2007, which does provide some relief to those taxpayers who face debt forgiveness (which would otherwise be taxable) relating to their real estate.

There are significant limits on the relief, however. Here are the requirements:
• The debt applies to a principal residence as defined in Internal Revenue Code Section 121.

• The debt was used to acquire, construct or substantially improve the principal residence (as defined in Internal Revenue Code Section 163(h)).

• The amount of the forgiven debt is not included in the taxpayer’s income, but it reduces the taxpayer’s basis in the property.(This will increase the gain on the sale if the property is sold, and that gain is taxable).

• The amount of the forgiven debt also reduces, dollar for dollar, the amount of gain that can be excluded under other provisions (IRC Section 121).

• Only the first $2 million of forgiven debt is excluded from income.

A principal residence for IRS purposes may not be the same as homestead property. A principal residence is property which has been owned and used, during the 5-year period ending on the date of the sale or the debt forgiveness, as the seller’s primary residence for a total of at least 2 years. Often, a seller did not use the property as a principal residence for 2 years or more during the prior 5 years, even if he declared it as homestead property. If it’s not a principal residence under this definition, there is no tax relief under the MDFRA.

The other requirement that is often not met is the use of the debt to acquire, construct or substantially improve the principal residence. Many property owners refinanced to access cash for reasons unrelated to the property: they started a business, paid off a car loan or credit cards, or took a vacation. Any part of the funds used for those purposes remains taxable. However, if the proceeds were used to add a pool, renovate a kitchen or replace the roof, that portion of the debt forgiven will be excluded from taxable income.

Myth #2 – “I’ll have a loss on the property, so I don’t need to worry about tax.”
Capital losses resulting from the sale of the property will not offset the income resulting from the forgiveness of debt. Also, sellers often believe they have a “loss” on their property when in fact they don’t – selling it for less than you owe isn’t the test. If your basis is less than the debt forgiven, you can actually have a gain. This often happens in the short sale situation, due to the reduction of basis (see 1c above).

Myth #3 – “I can use the capital gain exclusion to wipe out any taxable income from the short sale.”
The exclusion is a capital gain exclusion only. Income from debt forgiveness is ordinary income, not capital gain. This exclusion is only helpful if a capital gain results from the reduction in the basis of the property. But beware, (as mentioned in 1d above) the amount of the forgiven debt which is excluded from taxable income also reduces the amount of gain that can be excluded under this provision, dollar for dollar.

Myth #4 – “I’m in a low tax bracket, so the tax won’t be that much.”
Before the transaction in question, the seller probably was in a low tax bracket. If the debt forgiven is large (and it’s not unusual these days to see amounts of $50,000-$150,000 and higher), this increases the seller’s taxable income by that amount. It’s like getting a big fat paycheck that you never see, and it puts many sellers into higher tax brackets than their historical rates.

Myth #5 – “I have no assets, so I’m insolvent and don’t need to worry about the tax consequences of a short sale.”
This is true as far as it goes: Section 108 of the IRC indeed provides for excluding forgiven debt from income to the extent the seller is insolvent. However, just because a seller is upside down on their property doesn’t mean they’re insolvent for this purpose. The extent of insolvency for IRS purposes is the difference between the outstanding liabilities and fair market value of the assets (this is all assets, including protected assets such as retirement accounts) owned by the Seller on the date of the short sale. It is virtually impossible to reach a conclusion on insolvency for this purpose without a detailed analysis of all of the seller’s assets and liabilities, including those unrelated to the property, as well as the basis reduction that would occur in the short sale. Bankruptcy reflects a debtors’ “insolvency”.

The good news on this one is that, unlike the MDFRA, the insolvency exclusion applies to investors. This is an important aspect to explore for them particularly. Although to be categorized as an “investor” may be a difficult concept. You may end up in tax court spending thousands of dollars to defend your position.

Myth #6 – “I heard that the IRS isn’t going after people due to the economic climate.”
Ok, this one doesn’t stem from a grain of truth; it’s just wishful thinking. The IRS is actually increasing its enforcement and collection efforts in the current economic climate. It’s primary purpose is to collect revenue; and the government needs revenue as much as anyone else these days.

Myth #7 – “I’ll just tell the lender that I don’t want a 1099.”
Good luck with that. The 1099-C requirement is not negotiable: it’s the law. If the debt is forgiven, the tax liability has been generated. The lender must report it, and so must the property owner (even if they don’t receive a 1099-C by January 31 of the year following the short sale). Sellers can be subject to a 25% reporting penalty if they don’t report the debt forgiveness; this is not one to be taken lightly.

Myth #8- “a friend heard on the news that there is no tax on short sales anymore.”
See Myth #1. And stop watching the news and listening to your friends tax and legal “expertise”.

Myth #9 – “I’ll just let the property go into foreclosure, rather than do a short sale, to avoid the taxes.”
This wouldn’t necessarily help you. The tax is the same regardless of how the debt forgiveness comes about: a short sale, principal reduction loan modification or deed in lieu of foreclosure all have the same effect. The only potential difference is the amount of the debt forgiven.

Myth #10 – “If I end up owing tax, I’ll just file bankruptcy.”
Chances are, you’ll still owe the tax. Income tax is not typically discharged in bankruptcy. While there are a few exceptions: Income tax liabilities were assessed over 1095 days from the day you bankruptcy case is filed may be dischargeable. 

A Tax Dischargeability Report can be obtained from Corey Belcher, CPA of Belcher Deductions @ 303.495.5578 for $200.00.

The tax implications of short sales are more complex than the mass media would lead us to believe, and there is considerable misunderstanding among property owners as to what the rules are and how they would apply. We hope to dispel the myths by informing our clients.

We are professionals who can help and help them plan appropriately. Call us for a Free Consultation.